High CourtsDivision Bench(1922) 04 AHC CK 0001

Ram Sundar Tewari and Others vs Musammat Kulwanti Kunwar and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 10 April 1922 · Citation: 66 Ind. Cas. 499

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walsh, J · Stuart, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 149 words

Walsh, J.—General principles of law must be applied to arbitration matters as to all others. It has been found in this case that the persons objecting to the legal flaw in the award are the persons �who procured it. In other word, that they got the arbitrator to refuse to sign the award. The Court has found that the re-calcitrant arbitrator agreed to the award. His failure to sign it in undoubtedly a legal flaw, but it is a flaw which the plaintiffs cannot take advantage of, because they procured it. On that ground alone we think that the learned Judge should have decided as he did, although it is true that he has not expressed himself very well on the subject. It is certainly, to my mind, a conclusive answer to revision.

Shjast, J.

2.

I agree.

3.

Application dismissed with costs, including fees on the higher stale.