High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 11 P&H CK 0025

Ram Singh @ Ramdeep Singh vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 November 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suvir Sehgal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 44511 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 548 words

Suvir Sehgal, J

1.

Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.82 dated 17.09.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 34, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Rohrai/Rohadai, District Rewari, Annexure P1, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise along with affidavits dated 10.07.2023, Annexure P2.

2.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that FIR is a fallout of an altercation between the parties, who are neighbours. He submits that the dispute arose due to a misunderstanding, which has been removed and the dispute has been amicably settled by compromise, Annexure P2 and the parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate and recorded their statements.

2.

Upon instructions, State counsel submits that the trial is under-way.

3.

Counsel for the complainant and injured, respondents No.2 and 3, has admitted the factum of compromise.

4.

Heard counsel for the parties.

5.

Pursuant to order dated 10.08.2023 passed by this Court, report has been received from the Judicial Magistrate, relevant extract of which is as under:-

“(i) the number of accused arraigned in the FIR and how many have appeared before it and have made statements and whether any accused is absconding/P.O. in the case – In this regard, it is submitted that total seven persons have been arraigned as accused in the FIR and all of them have appeared before the Court and suffered statement. It is further submitted that none of the accused is absconded (sic absconding) or has been declared as proclaimed person by the Court.

(ii) the name of the complainant and injured/aggrieved and whether all of them have appeared and made their statements in support of compromise – In this regard, it is submitted that complainant is Birender @ Binder son of Bishamber Dayal and injured is Naresh son of Bishamber Dayal and both of them have appeared and suffered statement in support of the compromise.

(iii) the stage of trial/proceedings – Case is at the stage of prosecution evidence.

(iv) if the compromise is genuine, voluntary and out of free will of the parties:- In this regard, it is submitted that compromise has been effected between the parties is without any threat or pressure and is genuine, voluntary and out of the free will of the parties.

(v) whether any other criminal case is pending against the accused – In this regard, statement of I.O. has been recorded and he has stated that no other criminal case is pending against the accused persons”

7.

In view of the report given by the learned Magistrate and judgment of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and a Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, this Court is of the view that keeping the criminal proceedings alive would not serve any purpose and setting them aside would enable the parties to lead a harmonious and peaceful life.

8.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.82 dated 17.09.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 34, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Rohrai/Rohadai, District Rewari, Annexure P1, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners.