High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 11 MP CK 0081

Ram Singh And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 19 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sujoy Paul, J · Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 4803 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 264 words

Heard on I.A.No.16376/2019, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed for appellant no.2, Raama @ Rama.

The appellant was convicted under Sections 302/149 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life and R.I. for 1 year with

fine of Rs.5000/- and Rs.1000/- respectively with default stipulation.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this Court was kind enough in granting bail to the co-accused, Ram Singh by order dated 6.8.2018. This

appellant has also not used any dangerous weapon as per prosecution story. The ""Danda"" was recovered from the appellant. By taking this court to

FSL report. it is argued that blood stains were not found on the said Danda. As per injuries found on the decease, the appellant has not caused any

grievous injuries which may cause death of the deceased. The final hearing of appeal may take time and hence remaining jail sentence of appellant

may be suspended.

Prayer is opposed by learned P.L..

We have heard counsel for the parties at length and perused the record. Appellant was held guilty for committing offence under Section 148 and 149

also. The multiple persons caused multiple injuries on the deceased.

This court granted the benefit of suspension of sentence to co-accused, Ram Singh because the said co-accused has not used any weapon and

allegedly used the body parts (kicks and fists). The present appellant was carrying 'Danda' and there were certain injuries found on the person of

deceased which could be caused by 'Danda'. More than one eye witness deposed against the appellant.