High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0034

Ram Phal Bareth vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 20 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Civil No2836 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 416 words
1.

Heard.

2.

The petitioner has called in question the regularisation of respondent No.4 Mukesh Kumar Dubey on the post of AG-III in the Establishment of

Nagar Panchayat, Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (CG).

3.

The essence of challenge is on the basis that the petitioner is already working as Peon in the said Nagar Panchayat, therefore, the regularisation of

respondent No.4 on the post of AG-III would deprive him of promotion as AG-III as after regularisation of respondent No.4, no post of AG-III is

vacant.

4.

In the return filed by respondent No.3, it is averred that in the initial set up of the newly constituted Nagar Panchayat, Baloda, in the year 1982, one

post of AG-II, one post of AG-III and two posts of Peon were sanctioned, however, in the revised set up, two additional posts of AG-III was

sanctioned, out of which, on one post, Mr. Sudhram Yadav was promoted on 10.7.2007, against which, the petitioner did not raise any grievance. The

first post having been filled up by promotion, the other post of AG-III was to be filled up by direct recruitment, against which, respondent No.4 has

been regularised as AG-III in the meeting of the President-in-Council of the said Nagar Panchayat held on 8.5.2008.

5.

As against the said order, the petitioner preferred this writ petition after more than 2 years i.e. on 15.6.2010. The petitioner has not pointed out any

statutory prescription by which, the post, on which, respondent No.4 has been regularised, was required to be filled up by promotion. Even otherwise,

one post of AG-III was filled up by promotion of Sudhram Yadav and other post meant for direct recruitment has been filled up by regularisation of

respondent No.4.

6.

In addition to what has been stated above, it is also to be seen that according to respondent No.3 Nagar Panchayat, Baloda, the petitioner is not

eligible for promotion to the post of AG-III as he would not possess the requisite qualification of Hindi Typing pass as well as Higher Secondary pass.

7.

In view of the above, there is no substance in the writ petition and the same is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.

8.

However, in the event, any post of AG-III in the promotion quota falls vacant in the Establishment of Nagar Panchayat, Baloda and the Nagar

Panchayat decides to fill up the vacancy by promotion, the petitioner's case may be considered in the extant rules, if he possesses the requisite

qualification and is eligible.