High Courts(1987) 03 P&H CK 0058

Ram Pal and ors. vs Jagrup Singh and ors.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 March 1987 · Citation: (1987) 2 CurLJ 454 : (1987) PLJ 355 : (1987) 1 RCR(Rent) 626 : (1987) RRR 409

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.P.Goyal, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 3279 of 1986

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 213 words

S.P. Goyal, J. (Oral)

1.

For nonappearance of the petitioners on August 29, 1986, exparte proceedings were ordered against them and statement of one witness of the plaintiffs was recorded. They moved an application on October 4, 1986 for setting aside the exparte proceedings. The reason stated for nonappearance was that Labhu Ram''s daughter and grandson fell ill on that day and had to be taken to the hospital. The trial Court, holding that there was no justifiable cause, dismissed the application. Hence this revision.

2.

It has been now repeatedly held that a fair trial should not be denied to a party even if it is found that his failure to appear on some date was because of negligence on his part. The Supreme Court has also ruled that the words "sufficient cause" have to be very liberally construed and for any negligence the other party can be well compensated with costs. The trial Court, therefore, illegally refused to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it in declining the prayer for setting aside the exparte proceedings. So this petition is allowed and the exparte proceedings are set aside on payment of Rs. 100/ as costs. The parties through their counsel have been directed to appear in the trial Court on April 2, 1987.