High CourtsSingle Bench(1917) 07 AHC CK 0013

Ram Nath vs Sekhdar Singh

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 2 July 1917 · Citation: AIR 1918 All 210 : (1918) ILR (All) 51 : 45 Ind. Cas. 323

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J
RESULT
Disposed Of

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 159 words

Piggott, J.—This was a suit for money in a Court of Small Causes. That court has refused to entertian it on the ground that it is not cognizable by that court, being a suit for rent. It presumably refers to paragraph (8) of the second schedule to the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, No. IX of 1887. If it were a suit for rent at all it would be cognizable by a Revenue Court under the provisions of the Tenancy Act, and the Revenue Court has already refused to entertain a claim for this money, though the defendant is not to blame for this. On the plaint as drafted the claim is for damages for breach of a contract. I set aside the order of the court below and direct that court to re-admit the suit on to its file of pending cases and to dispose of it according to law. Costs here and hitherto will abide the event.