Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 11 ITAT CK 3659

Ram Manohar Educational and Samudai Bal Vikas Society vs CIT(Exemptions), New Delhi-110002

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi · Decided on 19 November 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member · Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 4286/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 207 words

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

This assessee’s appeal arises against the CIT(Exemption), Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1076566185(1) dated 30.05.2025, in proceedings u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(E)’s detailed discussion has quoted the assessee’s failure in filing all the re levant details thereby declining it’s claim of section 80G registrations as a char itable trust.

4.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and are of the considered view that since the CIT(E) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee , possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and it’s arguing counsel/auditor could not be altogether ruled out.

5.

Faced w ith this situation and in the larger interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the le arned CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunitie s subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at it’s own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accor dingly.

6.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.