Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3547

Ram Gupta vs NFeAC

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 24 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhumita Roy, Judicial Member · Amitabh Shukla, Accountant Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.8995/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 237 words

PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:

The instant appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 30.10.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)] under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment Order dated 18.12.2019 passed by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ld. AO’) for Assessment Year 2017-18.

2.

The assessee has been provided several opportunities of hearing to submit relevant evidences to substantiate the grounds of appeal. However, there has been no response from the assessee. A final opportunity was provided and a notice was issued fixing the hearing on 07.05.2024. Even to this final notice there was no response from the appellant. As stated several notices were issued in this case for hearing, but they were neither responded to nor were any adjournment sought. The details of opportunities of hearing provided are detailed as under:-

S. No.Date of NoticeDate of hearingRemarks
1.19.02.202027.02.2020No reply
2.27.02.202005.03.2020No reply
3.19.05.202029.05.2020No reply
4.26.12.202011.01.2021No reply
5.21.01.202207.02.2022No reply
6.06.03.202412.03.2024No reply
7.26.04.202407.05.20240No reply
3.

the assessee has not been able to justify non-appearance before the Ld. CIT(A) and, therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere wih the order passed by the Ld.CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal confirming the addition made by the Ld. AO.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.