Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 11 SC CK 0112

Ram Ekbal Upadhya and Others vs State of Bihar

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 17 November 2000 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 2767 : (2000) AIRSCW 3139 : (2000) 5 ALT 37 : (2000) 87 FLR 130 : (2000) 10 JT 158 : (2000) 2 MPJR 517 : (2000) 4 PLJR 95 : (2000) 6 SCALE 296 : (2000) 7 SCC 210 : (2000) SCC(L&S) 897 : (2000) 3 SCR 69 Supp : (2000) 6 Supreme 136

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. P. Sethi, J · K. T. Thomas, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No: 989 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 243 words

K.T. Thomas J.-Leave granted.

2.

Having considered the case with two rival versions of the same occurrence and on the fact situation in this case we think that the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code as found by the courts below can be altered to Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. The one injury which is described as a grievous hurt is the loss of the index finger of one of the injured. Though we don''t have full materials regarding the injuries sustained by the accused it is an admitted fact that they have also sustained injuries in the same occurrence. Considering all these aspects we alter the section of offence to Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Now coming to the question of sentence we are told that both sides have now come to terms. A joint application has been filed for showing the fact of settlement. The injured are represented in this Court by a counsel and he also confirms the fact that disputes have been settled between the two warring groups.

4.

In view of the changed situation and also on the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case we are of the opinion that the sentence can be reduced to imprisonment for a period already suffered by the appellants (we are told that the appellants have already undergone imprisonment for about 4 months). We, therefore, dispose of this appeal in the above terms.