High CourtsSingle Bench(2016) 03 P&H CK 0073

Rakesh Kumar vs Tarsem Chand

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 March 2016 · Citation: (2016) 3 RCRCivil 190

HON’BLE JUDGES
Darshan Singh, J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CR No.1831 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 172 words

Darshan Singh, J. (Oral) - The present civil revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.02.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Sunam, vide which the application moved by the petitioner for striking off defence of respondent-defendant for not filing the written statement beyond the period of 90 days has been dismissed.

2.

I have perused the impugned order, which shows that the written statement and reply to the interim injunction application was filed on that very date when the application for striking off defence was moved by the petitioner. It has also been observed by the learned Civil Judge that the respondent was granted time to file the written statement till that date and the same has been filed on that very date.

3.

Thus, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order calling for any interference by this Court while exercising the supervisory powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

4.

Resultantly, the present revision petition having, no merits, is hereby dismissed.