High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 DEL CK 0362

RAJU@ CHANAKYA vs THE STATE

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.P.GARG
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN. 300 OF 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 201 words

S.P.GARG, J.

1.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.329/2013 under Section 302 IPC registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar. Status report is on

record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner is in custody since 29.08.2013. Material prosecution

witnesses have already been examined. The case of the prosecution is based upon circumstantial evidence. The petitioner and the deceased were

acquainted with each other prior to the incident. Allegedly a dispute arose between petitioner, his associates and thevictim over a trivial issue. As per

DNA report co-accused Manoj, the Juvenile facing trial before the Juvenile Justice Board was connected with the crime.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the role assigned to the petitioner in the crime, he is admitted to bail on his furnishing

personal bond in the sum of `50,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The petitioner shall not contact and

criminally intimidate the complainant and the prosecution witnesses in any manner, whatsoever.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

5.

Trial court record be sent back forthwith along with the copy of the order.