High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 1397

Rajman vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 9 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPS No. 7389 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 314 words

Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J

1.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Husband of petitioner stood retired as Work Charged/Contingency Paid Employee. He would further submit that the husband of petitioner was entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment. He stated that an identical issue has already been come up for hearing before this Court bearing Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.09.2022. In the light of Faguvaram (supra) the petitioner raised identical issue which may be allowed in her favour. He submits that, at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation before the respondents/competent authority and respondents/competent authority may be directed to consider and decide the representation of petitioner expeditiously within specific period as fixed by this Court.

2.

Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, she is having no objection.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available in record.

4.

Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits, this petition is disposed of in light of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) reserving liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the event, petitioner submits representation, her claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with the relevant rules and law and after verification of the service records of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within the period of 'three months' from the date of receipt of the such representation, keeping in mind the decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (Supra).

5.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions.