Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 12 ITAT CK 4825

Rajlaxmi Charitable Trust vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 24 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 7582/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 350 words

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM:

This assessee’s appeal ITA no. 7582/Del/2025 for assessment year 2016-17 arises against CIT(A)/JCIT(A)-1, Chennai’s order dated 12.09.2025 (DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1080680562(1), in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the learned lower authorities have refused section 11(2) exemption to the assessee; a registered charitable trust, for the sole reason of having belatedly filed its Form 10, in assessment order dated 19.12.2018 as upheld in the lower appellate discussion.

3.

Faced with this situation, the tribunal hereby notices from a perusal of the case records that the assessee/appellant had physically filed its Form 10 audit report on 26.07.2016 i.e. well before submitting its section 139(1) return dated 11.05.2017 which followed e-filing thereof on 18.12.2018 i.e. again before the Assessing Officer’s assessment order passed on 19.12.2018. The Revenue vehemently argues that the above compliance is mandatory in nature and the assessee is not entitled for its impugned exemption claim in very terms therefore.

4.

I have given my thoughtful consideration to the assessee and the Revenue’s respective vehement contentions. I find no reason to concur with both the learned lower authorities respective findings rejecting the assessee’s impugned exemption claim. Suffice to say various judicial precedents including CIT v. Xavier Kelvani Mandal Pvt. Ltd. [2014] 41 taxmann.com 184(Gujarat) & CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries (1993) 201 ITR 325 (Gujarat), have already settled the issue that such a compliance of uploading Form 10 or 10A or Form 10B tax audit report; as the case may be, is only directory in nature. It is further reiterated that the assessee had duly filed its prescribed audit report in Form 10 vey well before from the learned Assessing Officer’s assessment (supra). I accordingly accept the assessee’s sole substantive ground herein and direct the learned Assessing Officer to finalize the consequential computation afresh as per law.

5.

This assessee’s appeal ITA No. 7582/Del/2025 is allowed.