High Courts(2011) 02 AHC CK 0195

Rajjab Aliansari vs State of U.P.and another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 10 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 8 RCR(Criminal) 2190

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shri Narayan Shukla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Case No. 184 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 188 words

Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that till date the case has not been committed on the ground that further proceeding is pending, whereas even during the course of further proceeding, the case can be committed to the court of competent jurisdiction for trial.

2.

On the other hand, Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. informs that since the original copy of the case diary has been handedover to the Investigating Officer, the learned trial court is helpless to commit the case for trial, whereas I am of the view that there is no occasion to handover the original copy of the case diary to the Investigating Officer.

Therefore, I hereby dispose of the petition with the direction to the learned court below to get returned the original paper of the case diary from Investigating Officer and commit the case to the court of competent jurisdiction for trial.

3.

It is further provided that in place of original documents of case diary, he can provide the photo copy of the case diary to the Investigator.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of finally.