High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 02 DEL CK 1109

Rajiv Sharma vs Commissioner Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 12 February 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Case (C) No. 1495 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 228 words

Manoj Jain, J

1.

On the last date when this petition was taken up, in order to ensure that the process of law was not being misused, this Court had directed the petitioner to file an affidavit with respect to certain relevant aspects.

2.

Such direction has not been complied with, as no affidavit has been filed by the petitioner.

3.

None appears from the side of the petitioner either.

4.

Learned counsel for respondent/MCD however, submits that they have already taken requisite action in the matter and the property in question is lying sealed and some RCC roof panels have also been demolished and the reinforcement was cut with the help of gas-cutter.

5.

It is also submitted that further action is slated for 27th instant which depends on the availability of police force.

6.

Status report has already been filed in this regard which is, however, still not on record. However, during course of arguments, hard copy of the same was shared, which the Court has perused.

7.

In view of the above, no further action seems required in the present contempt petition.

8.

Keeping in mind the above, and the fact that no affidavit has been filed by the petitioner, it becomes obvious that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with the present contempt petition.

9.

The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of.