High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 GAU CK 3925

Rajib Agarwala vs The Union Of India & Ors.

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 7 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Devashis Baruah, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WP(C)/2722/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 477 words

Heard Mr. D. Saraf, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. S. C. Keyal, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Jain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 & 6. None appears on behalf of the Finance and Taxation Department on call.

2.

The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the Order-in-Original dated 13.03.2024 primarily on two grounds. The first ground is as regards the extension of the period for exercise of powers under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Act of 2017’) vide Notification No.9/2023-CT dated 31.03.2023. The second ground is that the Petitioner having already submitted the return on 23.10.2019, the Petitioner should have been granted the benefit of the Input Tax Credit availed/utilized.

3.

Mr. D. Saraf, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that taking into account the amendment of Section 16 of the Act of 2017 by the Finance Act, 2024 whereby Section 16(5) was inserted, the instant writ petition can be disposed of on the basis of Section 16(5) of the Act of 2017.

4.

Taking into account the said submission, this Court finds it relevant to reproduce Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the Act of 2017:

“16(5). Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (4), in respect of an invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both pertaining to the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, the registered person shall be entitled to take input tax credit in any return under section 39 which is filed up to the thirtieth day of November, 2021.”

5.

A perusal of the above quoted Sub-Section would show that notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-Section (4) in respect of an invoice or debit note for supply goods or services or both pertaining to the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, the registered person shall be entitled to take Input Tax Credit in any return under Section 39 which is filed up to 30.11.2021.

6.

In the instant case, from a perusal of the Order-in-Original dated 13.03.2024, it is apparent that the Petitioner has submitted the return on 23.10.2019 for the Financial Year 2018-19. Under such circumstances, it is therefore the opinion of this Court that the benefit of the ITC claimed amounting Rs.84,58,480/- cannot be denied in view of Section 16(5) of the Act of 2017. In that view of the matter, the impugned Order-in-Original dated 13.03.2024 is required to be interfered with.

7.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the following observations and directions:

(i)

The impugned Order-in-Original dated 13.03.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax, Guwahati Division-I stands set aside and quashed.

(ii)

Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

(iii)

No costs.