High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 02 DEL CK 0115

Rajesh Kumar Singhal vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 20 February 2001

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramesh Chandra Chopra, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. (M) 171 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 181 words

Heard.

1.

In the FIR there was no allegation whatsoever against the petitioner regarding assault or injury to the complainant. It appears that subsequently a supplementary statement was recorded in which it was alleged that the petitioner had snatched some money from the complainant. Int he absence of these allegations in the FIR, the supplementary statement cannot be safely relief upon especially for the reasons that the dispute between the parties appear to be on account of possession of some property.

2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegations against he present petitioner, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to him. The petitioner has been joining investigations. The applications is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail upon his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall, however, continue to join investigations as and when required.

dusty.

3.

Anticipatory Bail allowed.