High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 12 SHI CK 0113

Rajesh Kumar vs State Of HP And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 27 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.A. Sayed, CJ · Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 8906 Of 2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 193 words

A.A. Sayed, CJ

1.

The petitioner, who is working as Head Constable with the respondent-Department, is seeking pay and salary at par with his junior under FR (Fundamental Rules) 22 (1) (a) (I) after removing the anomalies.

2.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2087-2088 of 2022 (Union of India & Ors. Versus Shri C.R. Madhava Murthy & Anr.).

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation dated 26.08.2022 (Annexure P-10) to respondent No.4-Commandant 1st HPAT (Himachal Pradesh Armed Police) Junga, District Shimla.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner would be content if the aforesaid representation is decided in a time bound manner.

5.

In the circumstances, we accede to the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner and accordingly direct respondent No.4 to decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-10) expeditiously and not later than eight weeks from today.

6.

The petition to stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.