High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 08 DEL CK 0204

Rajender Kumar Sharma vs Moti Ram and Another

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 August 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kait, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Mac. App. 1090 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 248 words

Suresh Kait, J.—The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 10.07.2012 passed by the Ld. Tribunal whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 3,47,600/- as compensation with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition till realization. Vide the present appeal, the appellant has sought enhancement of the compensation amount. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued only on the issue that the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 20 years whereas Ld. Tribunal has considered the age of the father and applied 8 as the multiplier.

2.

The law has been settled on the issue whether the age of the deceased or the age of the parents has to be considered. If the deceased is a bachelor then the age of the parents has to be considered in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Others Vs. Trilok Chandra and Others, and Smt. Sarla Verma and Others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another,

3.

Admittedly, the deceased was bachelor and died at the age of 20 years. It is also admitted fact that the age of father of the deceased was 48 years at the time of accident. Accordingly, Ld. Tribunal has rightly applied 8 as the multiplier.

4.

Therefore, keeping in view the settled law, I do not find any substance in the instant appeal. The same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.