High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 03 AHC CK 0027

Rajeev Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 6 March 2002 · Citation: (2002) 2 AWC 1199 : (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1113

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Tiwari, J · M. Katju, J
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 27249 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 202 words

M. Katju and R. Tiwari, JJ.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Despite order dated 25.7.2001, no counter-affidavit has been filed.

3.

The petitioner has been selected by the U. P. Higher Education Service Commission for appointment as a Lecturer in Agricultural Botany at Raja Mahendra Pratap Post Graduate College. Narson, Roorkee. which is how in Uttaranchal State. Since the Government of Uttaranchal has refused to give appointment (vide para 14 to the writ petition) in our opinion, the petitioner should be adjusted in a degree college in U. P.

4.

It has been stated in paragraph 25 of the writ petition that the management of K.V.P.G. College, Masra, Meerut, has issued a certificate of no objection to the petitioner for being recommended and appointed at K.V.P.G. College, Masra, Meerut. Hence, we direct that if a vacancy is still existing on the post of Lecturer in Agricultural Botany in K.V.P.G. College, Masra, Meerut, the petitioner should be given appointment there. If no vacancy in the said college is existing, then appointment should be given to him on the post of Lecturer in Agricultural Botany in some other degree college in U. P.

5.

With these observation the writ petition is disposed off.