High CourtsDivision Bench(1908) 12 MAD CK 0024

Rajaruthna Kavundan vs Doraisami Kavundan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 December 1908 · Citation: 4 Ind. Cas. 1134

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 108 words
1.

The application of the 2nd February 1904 was returned for amendment and return in 7 days. On the 4th March, the application was re-submitted after correction. The question is whether the re-submission amounts to an application to the Court to take a step-in-aid of execution under Article 179(4) of the second Schedule of the Limitation Act. We are clear that it does not. All that the applicant did on the 4th March, was to comply with an order of the Court. This is very different from making an application to the Court to do something towards the execution of the decree. The application is dismissed with costs.