High CourtsDivision Bench(1927) 01 BOM CK 0004

Rajaram Tukaram vs The Central Bank of India Limited

Bombay High Court · Decided on 31 January 1927 · Citation: (1927) 29 BOMLR 659 : (1927) ILR (Bom) 711

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kemp, J · Amberson Marten, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
O.C.J. Appeal No. 56 of 1926 and Suit No. 393 of 1926

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 111 words

Amberson Marten, C.J.—Having regard to the decision of the Full Bench, and the final result in Hatimbhai v. Framroz Dinshaw(1), it follows that this Appeal No. 56 of 1926 must also be dismissed.

2.

I would add that although technically this appeal was not actually before the Full Bench, yet the same leading counsel appeared as in the Full Bench Appeal No. 15 of 1926, It was only not put formally before the Full Bench because it was an appeal from my brother Fawcett who heard the case in the trial Court.

3.

The appeal will be dismissed with costs. Liberty to the mortgagee to add the costs to his security.