High Courts(1927) 05 CAL CK 0015

Rajani Kanto Pal vs Mohim Chandra Roy and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 May 1927 · Citation: AIR 1927 Cal 847 : 103 Ind. Cas. 698

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

The present appeal in so far as it relates to the order under Order 21, Rule 90, Civil P.C., is not maintainable as no second appeal is allowed under the law so far as that order is concerned. In so far as the appeal before us relates to the order u/s 47, Civil P.C., the appellant''s contention in the appeal is that the attachment of the properties was defective. The learned Subordinate Judge has referred to the ruling of this Court in the case of Sasirama Kumari v. Meherban Khan [1910] 13 C.L.J. 243 where it has been laid down that when a sale of immovable property has actually taken place, and its validity is impeached on the ground that the property was not attached, the absence of attachment does not, by itself, vitiate the sale. Following that decision, we are of opinion that there is no substance in this appeal and it should be dismissed with costs, hearing-fee one gold mohur to be divided amongst the several sets of respondents.