High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 11 MAD CK 0015

Raja Bahadur Narasingarji Gyangirji, Zemindar of Pamur Taluq, represented by his only duly authorized agent, Rama Chandra Aiyar vs Vaddamari Malakondayya Naidu

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 November 1914 · Citation: 29 Ind. Cas. 601

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tyabji, J · Oldfield, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 59 words
1.

The only point arguable in second appeal, with which we have been pressed, is whether Section 11(3) of Act VIII of 1865 and the corresponding provision of Act I of 1908 should be given retrospective effect. Foulkes v. Muthusami Goundan 21 M. 503 : 8 M.L.J. 207 is against this.

2.

The second appeal is dismissed with costs.