High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 08 MP CK 0303

Raj Kumar Kanathe and Others vs State of M.P. and Another

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 7 August 2012 · Citation: (2012) ILR (MP) 2083

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C. Mishra, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
M. Cr. C. No. 8163 of 2012 & Miscellaneous Cri. Case No. 8163 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 264 words

R.C. Mishra, J.

Heard on admission.

1.

This is a petition, u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ''the Code'') for quashing of the proceedings pending as Cri. Case No. 1537/06 in the Court of JMFC, Multai Distt. Betul. In that case, cognizance of the offence punishable u/s 498A read with 34 of the IPC has been taken against the petitioners upon a charge sheet submitted by SHO of P.S. Multai after due investigation into the FIR lodged by Geeta Bai, the respondent no. 2 here, whose marriage was solemnized with the petitioner no. 1 namely Raj Kumar on 20.6.1999. Learned counsel for the petitioners has strenuously contended that their prosecution for the offence is an abuse of the process of the Court in view of the fact that the marriage has already been declared as null and void, vide judgment and decree dated 22.6.2004 passed by Additional District Judge, Multai in Civil Suit No. 1 A/03, on the ground that Geeta had already contracted marriage with one Ganesh on 10.12.1995.

2.

However, as propounded by the Supreme Court in Reema Aggarwal Vs. Anupam and Others, the expression "husband" would cover a person who enters into marital relationship and under the colour of such proclaimed or feigned status of husband subjects the woman concerned to cruelty or coerce her in any manner or for any of the purposes enumerated in Section 498A of the IPC. In this view of the matter, no interference with a legitimate prosecution is called for under the inherent powers.

The petition, therefore, stands dismissed in limine.