AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Petitioners are ex-Delhi Vidyut Board employees, who upon unbundling of Delhi Vidyut Board, had become employees of first respondent. In this
petition, a direction is sought to first respondent to refix the revised pay of petitioners with effect from 1st January, 2006 by granting the benefit of
bunching as per Rule 7(1)(A)(ii) of the DTL (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009 read with Office Order No. DLT/1010/HR (G)/ 146 dated 29th August,
2016, as computed vide Annexure P-H in respect of first three petitioners and vide Annexure-I in respect of petitioner’s No. 4 and 5 and to
grant all consequential benefits thereof to petitioners.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that to claim the relief as sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure-G colly.) was made by
petitioners to first respondent, but according to petitioners’ counsel, there is no response to the said Representation made by petitioners.
Learned counsel for first respondent raises an objection regarding maintainability of this petition, which is sought to be refuted by petitioners’
counsel while relying upon Office Order of 29th December, 2009 (Annexure-E) of first respondent.
In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to leave the question of maintainability of this petition open, as this Court is
not deciding this petition on merits. The least, which is required to be done by first respondent, is to give a speaking response to petitioners’
Representation (Annexure-G colly.) in light of the Office Order of 21st December, 2009 (Annexure-A). Let the needful be done within a period of
eight weeks from today and the fate of said Representation be conveyed to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of
the remedies as available in law, if need be. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are accordingly disposed of.
