High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 BOM CK 0024

Raj Kishorilal Chadhha And Others vs State Of Maharashtra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 28 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nitin W. Sambre, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.1665 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 430 words

Nitin W. Sambre, J

1] Applicants are seeking regular bail in C.R. No.364 of 2021 registered with Chakan Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad for the offence punishable

under Sections 406, 409, 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

BDP-SPS 2/4 27 BA 1665.21.doc 2] Applicants were arrested on 23/3/2021. The allegations are that the Applicants have cheated the complainant

with an amount of Rs 18,50,00,000/-.

3] I have perused the allegation in the complaint and the other material placed on record. Deputy Commissioner of Police Mr. Sudhir Kallaya

Hiremath has filed an affidavit explaining the investigation carried out till date. The case of the prosecution/complainant is purely based on the alleged

cash amount of Rs 3,50,00,000/- given to the accused persons in the matter of carrying out business activities. Apart from the fact that said receipt is

denied by the Applicants, entire record depicts that the nature of transaction alleged in the complaint is a civil and contractual dispute for which

appropriate remedy is available to the complainant before the competent Court.

4] The Applicants were already subjected to custodial interrogation and investigation in the matter is sufficiently progressed. The affidavit of Deputy

Commissioner of Police who is supervising the investigation BDP-SPS 3/4 27 BA 1665.21.doc speaks about the same. The learned Public Prosecutor

Mr. Thakre submits that further custodial interrogation of the Applicant is not warranted as relevant material/documentary evidence is already seized.

5] The fact that source of the cash of Rs 3,50,00,000/- as rightly so claimed by the learned Counsel for the Applicant is not at all established during

investigation. Apart from above, the firm to which the said amount is claimed to have been handed over holds financial interest in the market and that

being so, it cannot be said that the Applicants are likely to abscond during trial. The exaggerated claim in the complaint has no legal basis for want of

documentary evidence about payments made.

6] In that view of the matter Application is allowed. 7] Applicants are directed to release on bail in C.R. No.364 of 2021 registered with Chakan

Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad on executing P.R. Bond of Rs 1 lakh with one or more sureties in the like amount.

BDP-SPS 4/4 27 BA 1665.21.doc Applicants shall not influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence. If so noticed, it is open for the prosecution

to move for cancellation of the bail of the Applicant. The applicant is permitted to furnish provisional cash bail security in the sum of Rs 1 lakhs for a

period of eight weeks in lieu of surety.