High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 09 MAD CK 0065

Rahuman Ali vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 September 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.Chandrasekharan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 20741 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 539 words

G.Chandrasekharan, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.08.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.277 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is falsely implicated as accused in Crime No.277 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act. Petitioner is in judicial custody from 12.08.2023. Thus, he prays for grant of bail.

3.In response, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that defacto-complainant and Police party on the basis of secret information mounted surveillance near Kodambakkam Trustpuram Corporation ground, at about 13.00 hours on 12.08.2023. Petitioner/accused was found in suspicious circumstances. After following necessary procedure, a search was conducted. Accused was found with illegal possession of 3kg of Ganja. Ganja was seized. Accused was arrested. It is the first case registered against the petitioner/accused under NDPS Act.

4.Considered the rival submissions and perused the records.

5.Considering the fact that Ganja had been seized and this is the first case registered against the petitioner/accused under NDPS Act, that petitioner is in judicial custody from 12.08.2023 and that material part of investigation might have been completed by this time, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner without prejudice to his defence shall deposit a non-refundable sum of Rs.10,000/-, by way of Demand Draft to the Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance (CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. Tamil Nadu, India, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai 600 009, S.B.Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFS Code IOBA0001172, CMPRF PAN: AAAGC0038F and that the receipt of such payment shall be produced before the concerned Magistrate at the time of executing the bond; It is made clear that merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00.a.m., until further orders.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.