AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Learned counsel for petitioner does not want to press
this bail application on behalf of petitioner No.2.
Heard rival submissions of the parties and the matter
of petitioner No.1.
After going through the First Information Report, which
has been registered against the petitioner for offence under
Sections 323, 341, 308 and 34 IPC and after going through the
order dated 30.05.2017 passed by learned Sessions Judge under
Section 438 Cr.P.C. passed after going through the relevant case
diary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner No.1
Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail
is allowed.
The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station
Mantowan, District Sawaimadhopur in FIR No. 176/2017 is
directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner No.1
Radheyshyam Farsawat S/o Shri Bihari Lal, shall be released on
bail, provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of
Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction
on the following conditions :-
(i) That the petitioner shall make himself
available for interrogation by a police officer
as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly
or indirectly make any inducement, threat
or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of case so as to dissuade him
from disclosing such facts to the court or
any police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave
India without previous permission of the
court.
Petition of petitioner No.2 is dismissed
as not pressed.