High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 09 P&H CK 0002

Radhey Shyam vs Punjab National Bank and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J · Avneesh Jhingan, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 22153 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 311 words
1.

In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for

quashing the possession notice dated 16.7.2018 (Annexure P-3) and publication of possession notice dated 21.7.2018 (Annexure P-4).

2.

The brother of the petitioner, namely, Shri Prem Chand Mittal purchased 100 square yard (20X45) plot one side open on internal road vide sale deed

dated 18.12.1989. Vide sale deed and gift deeds dated 14.9.1994 and 10.3.2003 (Annexure P-2 Colly), the petitioner became owner in possession of

two side open 176 square yards property. Respondent No.2 pasted a notice dated 17.7.2018 (Annexure P-3) on the said property for taking of

symbolic possession, in the absence of the petitioner. After enquiry, the petitioner came to know that his brother had taken loan against the sale deed

dated 18.12.1989 (Annexure P-1) and the said property was

not mortgaged. The said notice was published in the Financial Express vide publication dated 21.7.2018 (Annexure P-4). Accordingly, the petitioner

sent a representation dated 25.8.2018 (Annexure P-5) through e-mail to respondent No.2 for withdrawal of possession notice, but no response has

been received till date. Hence, the present writ petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the relief claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 25.8.2018

(Annexure P-5) through e-mail to respondent No.2, but no action has so far been taken thereon.

4.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we

dispose of the present petition by directing respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 25.8.2018 (Annexure P-5), in accordance

with law by passing a speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order.