High CourtsDivision Bench(1953) 04 MAD CK 0001

Rachabhathuni Brahmam and Another vs State of Madras

Madras High Court · Decided on 28 April 1953 · Citation: AIR 1954 Mad 277 : (1954) ILR (Mad) 200 : (1953) 66 LW 656 : (1953) 2 MLJ 307

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajamannar, C.J · Venkatarama Ayyar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Letters Patent Appeal No. 303 of 1952

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 183 words
1.

The order of the learned Judge Ramaswami J. directing the appellant to furnish security for stamp duty payable to Government as per decree of

the Court below and for the stamp duty payable on the appeal therefrom, cannot be supported in law. The appellant was permitted to file the suit

in ''forma pauperis'' and also the appeal in ''forma pauperis.'' In - Secretary of State Vs. Thayammal and Another, , Pandrang Row J. held that

where the plaintiff was allowed to sue the defendants in ''forma pauperis'' and was directed to pay the court-fee to the Government and there was

a further appeal in ''forma pauperis'', an application by the Government to direct the appellant to furnish security for court-fee due to it under the

lower Court''s decree is incompetent under Order 41, Rule 10, Civil P. C. The learned Judge also held that Order 33, Rule 13, Civil P. C. did not

support such an application. With respect, we are in complete agreement with this decision.

2.

The appeal is allowed and the Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 3059 of 1952 dismissed.