High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 09 MAD CK 0073

R. Sumathi vs The Inspector of Police, The District Superintendent of Police, The Superintendent of Police and Mohandoss

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 September 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Sathyanarayanan, J · M. Chockalingam, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
H.C.P. No. 1479 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 370 words

M. Chockalingam, J.—Invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court, one R. Sumathi has brought forth this petition, seeking for production of her

minor daughter Kumari.

2.

Affidavit filed in support of the petition is perused and heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The detenue also produced before

this Court along with the fourth Respondent.

3.

The case of the Petitioner is that her minor daughter is aged 17 years and when marriage was fixed for her, she was taken away by the fourth

Respondent along with 5 sovereigns of gold jewels. Immediately, she gave a complaint to the Respondent-police on 1.7.2010, but she was not

secured. Under the circumstances, this application has been brought forth by the Petitioner.

4.

When the matter was taken up for enquiry, learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that the alleged detenue is produced before this

Court along with the fourth Respondent. When this Court enquired the detenue, she stated that she is 18 years old and the marriage between her

and the fourth Respondent took place on 29th January, 2010 and a child was also born on 5.8.2010. The child is also brought by them. According

to her, she did her +2. Equally, the fourth Respondent also did +2. They fell in love with each other for three years. They developed intimacy and

thereafter, the marriage took place between them on 29th January, 2010. Their marriage was opposed to by her family members. Hence, both of

them went out of their houses on their own accord. The detenue is a major and the marriage also took place between them and they are also living

happily.

5.

As per the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the detenue was 17 years old. But, according to the detenue, she is 18 years

old. The detenue and the fourth Respondent fell in love with each other for three years, which culminated in their marriage in the month of January,

2010, as a result of which a child was also born. Both of them are leading a happy marriage life and they have blessed with a child.

6.

Recording the statement made by the detenue, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of.