High CourtsSingle Bench(1925) 02 MAD CK 0061

R. Duraiswamy Iyer vs C.S. Balasundaram Iyer and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 February 1925 · Citation: 94 Ind. Cas. 420 : (1926) 23 LW 319

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallace, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 109 words

Wallace, J.—The District Munsif has not decided whether "summons was not duly served" as he was bound to do under Article 164 of the Indian Limitation Act. A mere assertion of his ignorance of the decree by the petitioner and acceptance of that by the Court will not give the Court jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte decree. It has to decide also whether the summons was not duly served. This order was, therefore, made without jurisdiction and is hereby set aside and the case sent back for fresh decision.

2.

Costs upto date will abide the result. Refund of Court-fee on the civil revision petition is allowed.