High CourtsDivision Bench(1983) 01 MAD CK 0051

R. Chandra sekaran vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 January 1983 · Citation: (1985) 58 STC 204

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Shanmugam, J · G. Ramanujam, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case No''s. 26 and 27 of 1983 (Revision No''s. 23 and 24 of 1983 respectively)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 379 words
1.

Since the point involved in both the cases is the same, they are dealt with together. The disputed turnover in both the cases represents the sale

value of silver coins which have been made to the order placed by the Sankara Mutt. The assessee has firstly contended before the Tribunal that

the amount received by sale of the coins made out of silver was the amount received for work and labour and therefore the turnover cannot be

taxed.

2.

But, the Tribunal found that the assessee has used his own silver for manufacturing the coins according to the specifications given by the

purchaser that therefore, the coins should be taken to have been sold as finished goods and that it does not involve purely a works contract. The

second point urged by the assessee before the Tribunal was that the sale of silver coins was without any profit-motive and therefore, it should not

be taxed as sale. The Tribunal held that for purposes of sales tax profit element does not come in. Once there is a sale, whether the seller makes a

profit or not out of the transaction, the same is liable to be taxed. Therefore, the Tribunal has rightly held that even though the assessee has not

earned any profit out of the transaction, he is liable to be taxed as a seller. The third contention put forward by the assessee before the Tribunal

was that the sale of coins should be taken as the sale of specie and therefore, the sales should be taxed at the lower rate of 2% and not at 4% as

has been done by the assessing authority. The Tribunal has held that the assessee has made the coins out of the old silver and silver ornaments and

therefore, the manufactured product, viz., silver coins, cannot be said to be a specie. The Tribunal has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court

in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam Vs. G.S. Pai and Co., , to justify its conclusion that the coins

manufactured by the assessee cannot be taken to be a specie. We agree with the findings of the Tribunal on all the points.

3.

In the result, both the tax cases are dismissed.