High CourtsDivision Bench(1892) 01 MAD CK 0007

Queen-Empress vs Yohan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 January 1892 · Citation: (1894) ILR (Mad) 391

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J · Parker, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 174 words
1.

We cannot agree with the view taken by the Sessions Judge. The preamble and Sections 4, 5 and 68 of the present Act XV of 1872 are almost

identical with the preamble and Sections 4, 5 and 56 of Act V of 1865.

2.

Section 68, as amended by Section 6, Act II of 1891, makes punishable the solemnization of a marriage between persons of whom one is a

Christian, unless the person solemnizing such marriage has been authorized for that purpose u/s 5. It is conceded that the third accused was not

authorized u/s 5, and hence the case is exactly similar to that in Proceedings of the Madras High Court, dated 21st March, 1871 6 M.H.C.R App.

20 and the accused are, prima facie, liable to punishment.

3.

We are told that this application has been made by Government merely to obtain an au s not pressed for, having regard to the length of time

which has elapsed.

4.

We, therefore, do not think it necessary to pass any further order.