High CourtsDivision Bench(1891) 10 MAD CK 0010

Queen-Empress vs Thimmachi

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 October 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 93

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wilkinson, J · Shephard, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 126 words

Wilkinson, J.—I do not think the conviction can be maintained. Spreading a false report and thereby preventing people from bringing their

children for vaccination does not appear to me to amount to voluntary obstruction of the vaccinator in the performance of his public duties The

conviction and sentence should be quashed.

Shephard, J.

2.

To prevent by physical means persons willing to be vaccinated from being vaccinated might be obstruction of the vaccinator within the meaning

of the Section. But merely to dissuade a person from submitting to vaccination is another matter. That is not obstruction, for it is only with regard to

willing patients that the vaccinator has any duty. The conviction should be set aside, and the line, if paid, refunded.

3.

Ordered accordingly.