High CourtsDivision Bench(1895) 08 MAD CK 0003

Queen-Empress vs Rappel

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 August 1895 · Citation: (1895) ILR (Mad) 490

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J · Parker, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 181 words
1.

The High Court Proceedings of 7th December 1866 (3 M.H.C.R. App. IX) and 24th April 1873 (7 M.H.C.R. App. XXII) were passed

before the Penal Code was amended by Act VIII of 1882, and the effect of the amendment is to make Sections 40 and 64, Indian Penal Code,

applicable to offences under the Police Act XXIV of 1859. The incorporation of Sections 3 and 41 of Madras Act III of 1889 in Act XXIV of

1859 does not, therefore, now render the provisions of Sections 40 and 64, Indian Penal Code, inapplicable.

2.

think the sentences are not open to any legal objection.

1.

Section 4: Whoever neglects to fence in or protect any well,

Neglecting to fence in tank or other dangerous place or structure, or,

well, tank, &c. whoever causes any offensive matter to run from any house,

factory, dungheap or the like into the street--shall be liable on

Causing offensive matter conviction to a fine not exceeding fifty rupees or to imprisonment

to run from house &c. of either description which may extend to one month.