High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 04 MAD CK 0006

Queen-Empress vs Kanappa Pillai.

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 April 1897 · Citation: (1897) ILR (Mad) 387

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J · Shephard, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

The District Magistrate does not appear to have given any reasons for distrusting the truth of the complaint and sending the case for enquiry to

the Superintendent of Police. We infer that he acted upon the view expressed in paragraph 4 of his own circular No. 557, dated 18th April 1895.

We are of opinion that the rule there laid down is illegal, as Section 202 of the Code directs the Magistrate to send a case for enquiry by the Police

only when he distrusts the truth of the complaint, and it requires the Magistrate to give his reasons. The terms of the fourth paragraph of the District

Magistrate''s circular actually override the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 202.

2.

The orders of the Police are not binding on the magistracy.

3.

We are further of opinion that great caution should be shown in sending, for investigation by the Police, charges against members of that force.

In such cases it would generally be better that the enquiry should be prosecuted by a Magistrate.

4.

The District Magistrate is directed to proceed with the case according to law.

5.

Ordered accordingly.