High CourtsDivision Bench(1891) 10 MAD CK 0025

Queen-Empress vs Arlappa and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 October 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 137

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J · Arthur J.H. Collins, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 163 words

Collins, C.J.—I was at first inclined to think that a petition, u/s 419, Code of Criminal Procedure, sent through the post, should be received

as fulfilling the requirements of the Section, but on further consideration, I am of opinion that the decision of Kernan and Muttusami Ayyar, JJ.,

reported in Weir''s Criminal Rulings, page 1006, is correct. The words used in the Section are ""Every appeal shall be made in the form of a petition

in writing presented by the appellant or his pleader."" The word presented evidently means that such petition shall be delivered to the proper officer

of the Court either by the appellant or his pleader. Any other interpretation of the Section would give rise to numberless difficulties. I hold,

therefore, that a petition sent by post is not presented to the Court within the meaning of Section 419, Code of Criminal Procedure.

Shephard, J.

2.

I have had considerable doubts on this question, but am not prepared to differ.