High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 01 DEL CK 0194

Qualcomm Incorporated VsDeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Tax 3 (1)(1), Delhi And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Navin Chawla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1666, 1670, 1686, 1687 Of 2022, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 4800, 4804, 4840, 4841 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 367 words

Manmohan, J

1.

The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

By way of the present petitions, Petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to process the returns of income, issue correct computations and

process as well as issue refunds along with up to date interest for assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that even after completion of the entire proceedings and despite specific, binding and favorable orders of

the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) for the years under consideration and appeal effect orders dated 8th August, 2018, the Petitioner

is being denied legitimate TDS credit and refunds without any legal basis. In support of her contention, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon

Article 265 of the Constitution, decision of the Supreme Court in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India, [1997] 5 SCC 536 and decision of this

Court in Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, W.P.(C) 10373/2019.

4.

Issue notice. Mr.Puneet Rai, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents. He states that the Assessing Officer has passed rectification

orders with regard to the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 yesterday. He further states that refund for the assessment year 2012-13 was

adjusted against the demand for the assessment year 2008-09. He candidly states that matter for assessment year 2008-09 has been decided by the

ITAT and the Assessing Officer shall pass the appeal effect order within the time granted by the statute. He lastly states that the rectification order

for the assessment year 2011-12 shall be passed shortly.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court disposes of the present writ petitions and pending applications with the following directions:

i) The Assessing Officer is directed to issue refunds along with up to date interest for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 within six weeks.

ii) The Assessing Officer is directed to pass a rectification order and issue refund, if any, with up to date interest for the assessment year 2011-12

within ten weeks.

iii) The Assessing Officer is directed to pass an appeal effect order as well as pay refund, if any, with up to date interest for the assessment year

2012-13 within twelve weeks.