High CourtsDivision Bench(1902) 02 MAD CK 0025

Puthia Valappil Barga alias Kunhunha Umma vs Veloth Assenar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 February 1902 · Citation: (1902) ILR (Mad) 733

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moore, J · Bhashyam Ayyangar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 144 words
1.

It appears that the property was purchased by the plaintiff at a sale held in order to recover the amount due to Government as stamp fees in

Original Suit No. 26 of 1892 in which the plaintiffs therein succeeded. The property now in question was a portion of its subject-matter. Such

being the case the sum recoverable by Government was a first charge on the property u/s 411 of the Civil Procedure Code. The second defendant

was a subsequent purchaser of the same property in execution of a decree which he obtained against the estate of the deceased for debts due by

him. The Crown having a first charge on the property the plaintiff''s purchase prevails as against that relied on by the second defendant. On this

ground we confirm the decision of the District Judge and dismiss this second appeal with costs.