High Courts(1987) 01 P&H CK 0066

Purshotam Dass vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 January 1987 · Citation: (1987) 1 AICLR 251 : (1987) 1 RCR(Criminal) 495

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.S.Sodhi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 7331-M of 1986

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 206 words

S.S. Sodhi, J.

1.

On the face of it, the material on record discloses no case for the petitioners to answer. One part of the allegations was that the petitioners were manufacturing spurious sodawater. This charge was quashed by Sessions Judge, Jind, keeping in view the fact that the contents of the alleged sodawater were never chemically tested.

2.

As regards the surviving charge under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. This was founded upon the allegation supported by the statements of some witnesses that they had purchased Thums up and Campa Cola about 10/15 days earlier, which, when they drank, they discovered, was some other drink. Here again, it is pertinent to note that the contents of these bottles were never chemically tested nor is it any part of the allegation that the bottles in which these drinks were sold, were other than that what they purported to be. This being so, no charge under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is even prima facie made out. The charge under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is accordingly hereby quashed and the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge, Jind, set aside.

3.

This petition is thus accepted.