High CourtsDivision Bench(1919) 01 CAL CK 0060

Purna Chandra De vs Ambika Charan Adhikari and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 January 1919 · Citation: AIR 1919 Cal 25(1) : 53 Ind. Cas. 624

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shamsul Huda, J · Richardson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 158 words
1.

This is a Rule to show cause why further enquiry should not be made into the complaint filed by the petitioner.

2.

It appears that the petitioner had charged certain persons not only with assaulting some of his boatmen but also with theft of two chalis of bamboos. We are informed that the value of these bamboos is Rs. 1,000. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate after hearing the complainant sent the case to the local panchayat for investigation and report. The panchayat submitted a report which is among the papers before us. Apparently, on receipt of this report, the Sub Divisional Magistrate dismissed the complaint without giving the complainant an opportunity of being heard. In dismissing the complaint the Sub Divisional Magistrate refers only to the charge of assault and says nothing about the alleged theft of bamboos.

3.

In the circumstances we are of opinion that further enquiry should be made into this complaint and we direct accordingly.