High Courts(2003) 07 P&H CK 0106

Puran Chand vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 7 July 2003 · Citation: (2004) 1 AICLR 136 : (2004) 1 Cri.CC 106

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.S.Nijjar, J and S.S.Grewal, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 19973 of 2003 in Criminal Appeal No. 95-DB of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 186 words

S.S. Nijjar, J.

1.

This application for bail has been filed Puran Chand on the ground that the applicant has spent 5 years and 4 months in prison till now, and therefore, he is entitled to the concession of bail, in view of the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Dharampal v. State of Haryana, 1999(4) RCR(Criminal) 600. Ms. Palika Monga has submitted that the applicant has been convicted of a double murder. Apart from that, he was declared a proclaimed offender during the trial. Ultimately, he was apprehended on 7.2.1995 and only then, the trial could proceed.

2.

Having considered the entire matter, we are of the considered opinion that a person who has remained a proclaimed offender during the trial, cannot be automatically granted the concession of bail on the basis of the decision in the case of Dharampal (supra). A person who absconds during trial, would be even more likely to abscond after the conviction is maintained against him.

3.

In view of the above, we find no reason to grant bail to the applicant. Crl. Misc. application is dismissed.