High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0160

Punit Sharma vs Anil Kumar And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 922 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 221 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in accident claim case (MACT Suit No.125/10) instituted on 14.02.2008, whereby he had sought compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 16.04.2007.

2.

The Tribunal held inquiry and, on the basis of evidence led, accepted the said claim and awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.1,17,000/-, this inclusive of Rs.70,000/- for expenditure on treatment, Rs.10,000/- for pain and suffering, Rs.5,000/- for special diet and conveyance, Rs.8,000/- for attendant charges and Rs.24,000/- for loss of income.

3.

The present appeal was filed with the grievance that the compensation awarded is inadequate. It was put in the list of “Regulars” as per order dated 23.03.2016. When the matter is called out in its turn, there is no appearance on either side.

4.

A perusal of the memo of appeal reveals that the only specific grievance raised is with regard to the award being inadequate under the head of attendant charges. In the given facts and circumstances, where there is no case made out of any permanent disability, the plea cannot be accepted.

The award, as granted by the Tribunal, is found to be just and adequate.

5.

The appeal is dismissed.