High CourtsDivision Bench(2003) 07 PAT CK 0096

Punit Mukhiya vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 4 July 2003 · Citation: (2003) 2 BLJR 1452

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · R.N. Prasad, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.J.C. No. 6936 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 201 words

Ravi S. Dhawan, C.J. and R.N. Prasad, J.—There are two aspects of the matter. The first issue is as to whether there should have been recounting or not. This aspect is not before this Court.

2.

The second issue is as to whether Rule 79 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 be declared as ultra vires. Merely because the Returning Officer may not have recorded his reasons is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires. The petitioner may have a case provided he makes It out one that a certiorari be issued for examining whether in terms of Rule 79 the Returning Officer has recorded his reasons or not. Depending on the record whether reasons are recorded or not, the Court will examine the order of the Returning Officer. The fact that reasons may not be recorded is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires.

3.

In the circumstances, there is no good ground that Rule 79 aforesaid be declared as ultra vires.

The matter which survives in the petition is whether the order of the Returning Officer under the rule is good, or bad. This matter in the normal course will be before the learned Single Judge.