High CourtsDivision Bench(1894) 08 MAD CK 0013

Pullayya vs Ramayya

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 August 1894 · Citation: (1895) ILR (Mad) 144

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J · Muttusami Ayyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 113 words
1.

Here the judgment-debtor was in possession at the date of the sale and is now defendant. Plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the Court sale

and can be in no better position than his vendor. Nothing was done upon the writ of possession issued at the suit of the vendor's widow. The

execution purchaser would be barred and therefore the plaintiff is equally barred Arumuga v. Chockalinqam ILR 15 Mad. 831 The decision in

Kishori Mohun Roy Chowdhry v. Chunder Nath Pal ILR 14 Cal. 644 is distinguished by the fact that in that case there was formal delivery. We

must reverse the decree and we dismiss the suit with costs throughout.