High CourtsDivision Bench(1926) 09 MAD CK 0013

(Pulipaty) Subbayya vs Kandi Subba Reddi and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 September 1926 · Citation: AIR 1927 Mad 648

HON’BLE JUDGES
Odgers, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 156 words

Odgers, J.—It is contended that there can be a partial raising of an attachment by consent of parties outside the Court. This cannot be so;

Court must raise the attachment unless it becomes inoperative by the payment of the decree debt (vide Kunhi Moosa v. Makki [1900] 23 Mad.

478 There is no force in the plea that the attachment was raised by the agreement Ex. B. Nothing is said about it and if there were, it would need

an application to and an order of Court. Next the argument as to Section 61 of the Code of Civil Procedure. No authority has been shown to me

against the view taken by the learned District Judge. The section appears to me to be absolute. If a sale by consent or with the connivance of the

decree-holder were to be excepted the section would no doubt have said so.

2.

The Second Appeal is dismissed with costs.