High CourtsDivision Bench(1918) 02 CAL CK 0010

Pulin Behary Roy and Others vs Abdul Majid and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 8 February 1918 · Citation: 44 Ind. Cas. 911

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richardson, J · Beachcroft, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 161 words
1.

The question for consideration in this Rule is whether the rule laid down by this Court in the case of Ram Narain Nursing Doss v. Ram Chunder Jankee Loll 18 C. 86 : 9 Ind. Dec. (N.S. 58) has been superseded by Rule 4 of Order XXX. The point came before Mr. Justice Fletcher in the case of Bal Kissen Das Daga v. Kanhaya Lal 21 Ind. Cas. 509 : 17 C.L.J. 648. We agree with the view taken by Mr. Justice Fletcher that the rule laid down in the case cited no longer applies in view of the provisions embodied in Rule 4 of Order XXX. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in this way. The name of the added plaintiff Pulin Behary Roy will be struck out of the category of the plaintiffs and he will be dismissed from the suit. The claim will be decreed in full and the decree of the Court below will be modified accordingly.