High CourtsDivision Bench(1941) 02 MAD CK 0045

Public Prosecutor vs Ramanatham Pillai

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 February 1941 · Citation: AIR 1941 Mad 832

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 137 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—This is an appeal by the Provincial Government against the acquittal of the respondent of an offence u/s 328, Penal Code. The respondent is stated to have caused arsenic to be mixed in the food of P. Ws. 4 and 5 through P.W. 3, a girl aged 13 years, with intent to injure them; and according to the prosecution, P.W. 3 was an innocent agent. The Assistant Sessions Judge convicted the respondent on her evidence; and on appeal he was acquitted by the Sessions Judge on the ground that P.W. 3 was an accomplice. Hence this appeal, and the view of the Sessions Judge that P.W. 3 was an accomplice cannot be supported. The order of acquittal is therefore set aside and the appeal is remanded to the Sessions Judge for disposal on the merits.